Head-to-head

Google LLC, Petitioner v. VirtaMove, Corp., et al. vs. Mark Geraghty Wonders, Petitioner v. Office of the Army General Counsel vs. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

Administrative Law cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

The matchup

Relationship

Shared issue: Administrative Law
Why compared: Reviewed Administrative Law tags connect these current-term public cases.

Google LLC, Petitioner v. VirtaMove, Corp., et al.: 1. Whether the PTO retains statutory authority to deny institution based on the “settled expectations” factor, where discretion is committed to the PTO and no statutory provision prohibits consideration of settled expectations. 2. Whether the “drastic and extraordinary” remedy of mandamus is appropriate where Google identifies no statutory text that has been violated and the Federal Circuit has held that an alternative vehicle—a notice-and-comment rulemaking challenge—remains available.
Mark Geraghty Wonders, Petitioner v. Office of the Army General Counsel: 1. Did the Agency violate the law by disregarding a judge ’ s order and release only one of two legal reviews to the Petitioner in a security clearance hearing? 2. Did the Agency violate the law by misrepresenting the withheld legal review as a different Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") document, and completely redacting it, prior to submitting it to the Petitioner? 3. Did the Agency violate the law by denying the Petitioner ’ s subsequent 2012 and 2014 FOIA requests for the withheld legal review based upon claims of attorney-client privilege and FOIA protection not codified into the regulation until 2016?
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter: Do the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers?

Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.