Head-to-head

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. vs. Ongkaruck Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Sualeh Kamal Ashraf, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Administrative Law cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

The matchup

Relationship

Shared issue: Administrative Law
Why compared: Reviewed Administrative Law tags connect these current-term public cases.

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.: Are provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III?
Ongkaruck Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission: May the SEC seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm?
Sualeh Kamal Ashraf, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement Administration: 1. Whether, after Ruan v. United States, 597 U.S. 450 (2022), the Controlled Substances Act permits the Drug Enforcement Administration to revoke a physician’s registration—and a court of appeals to affirm that revocation—without any finding that the physician knowingly or intentionally violated the Act? 2. Whether due process permits an agency and a reviewing court to sustain the revocation of a professional license where the respondent demonstrates that material evidence relied upon by the agency was false or unreliable, and the court declines to address that showing? 3. Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s categorical refusal to apply Ruan’s mens rea requirement to administrative revocation proceedings conflicts with this Court’s interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act and creates an incentive for the government to bypass criminal safeguards by proceeding administratively?

Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.