Cases compared
Albert Glass v. Office of Chief Medical Examiner vs. Ali Mif Bey, Petitioner v. United States vs. Department of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC
Administrative Law cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
No. 25-7231No. 25-7299No. 25-966
Side by side
| Fact | Albert Glass v. Office of Chief Medical Examiner | Ali Mif Bey, Petitioner v. United States | Department of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docket | 25-7231 | 25-7299 | 25-966 |
| Status | Dismissed | Before Arguments | Before Arguments |
| Date | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | Argued Nov 10, 2026 |
| Question presented | 1. Is the taking of a deceased person ’ s organs by a state agency without pre authorization of said person or next-of-kin a violation of the Constitutional and legal rights of said person and next'of kin? 2. Also, without authorization is it a violation of this person ’ s next-of-kin ’ s constitutional and legal rights to give organs to research facilities? | Whether a court of appeals correctly applies Kisor when it finds a term "genuinely ambiguous" based on a multiplicity of dictionary definitions alone, or by invoking the regulation's purpose to introduce rather than resolve ambiguity. | 1. Whether Article III of the Constitution precludes the Department of Labor from adjudicating proceedings to collect monetary remedies from employers who have allegedly violated the terms and conditions of employment of H-2A workers and domestic workers in corresponding employment? 2. Whether 8 U. S. C. §1188(g)(2) authorizes the Department of Labor to adjudicate proceedings to collect monetary remedies from employers who have allegedly violated the terms and conditions of employment of H-2A workers and domestic workers in corresponding employment? |
| Summary | Albert Glass filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit case involving allegations that a state medical examiner took organs from a deceased person without permission from the person or next of kin. The case was dismissed, so the Court did not issue a ruling on those claims. | Ali Mif Bey asks the Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit ruling about when courts may defer to a federal agency’s reading of its own regulation. The petition argues that the Fourth Circuit wrongly treated regulatory language as genuinely ambiguous under Kisor v. Wilkie based only on competing dictionary definitions or by using the regulation’s purpose to create, rather than resolve, ambiguity. | This case concerns whether the Department of Labor may use its own administrative process to impose monetary remedies on an H-2A agricultural employer alleged to have violated required working and living conditions for visa and corresponding U.S. workers. The Court will consider both the agency’s statutory authority and whether Article III requires these claims to be decided first by a federal court. |
Relationship
- Shared issue
- Administrative Law
- Why compared
- Reviewed Administrative Law tags connect these current-term public cases.
Related
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.