Skip to main content

No. 25-901October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-901October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Benancio Garcia, III, Petitioner v. Steven Hobbs, Secretary of State of Washington, et al.

Benancio Garcia III challenged Washington’s Legislative District 15 as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Benancio Garcia III challenged Washington’s Legislative District 15 as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The lower courts held his claim was moot after a separate court proceeding replaced the district’s map; Garcia is asking the Supreme Court to review that ruling.

Question presented

Whether a plaintiff’s Equal Protection Clause racial gerrymandering claim is rendered moot when the challenged legislative district is replaced in a different proceeding by a judicial remedy that intensifies the plaintiff’s racial classification injury, and which is subject to ongoing appellate review?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

Benancio Garcia III says Washington's former Legislative District 15 was a racial gerrymander (a district drawn mainly based on race). Lower courts treated his claim as moot after a separate case replaced the map, and Garcia is asking the Supreme Court to review that conclusion.

Argument

The case has not been scheduled for oral argument. Garcia argues that replacing the district did not erase his claimed injury, while the lower courts concluded the claim was moot.

Impact

The case could determine whether voters may continue challenging an earlier district map after a court-ordered replacement changes the district. That affects residents of Legislative District 15 who say they were classified by race in drawing the district.

What is at stake in Garcia v. Hobbs?

The case asks whether replacing Legislative District 15 ended Garcia's racial-gerrymandering claim, even though he says the replacement intensified the injury.

Who could be affected by the Garcia v. Hobbs case?

Voters in Washington's Legislative District 15 could be affected because the case concerns whether their challenge to an earlier map can continue.

When will the Supreme Court act in Garcia v. Hobbs?

No oral argument is scheduled and no decision window has been announced. The next step could be an argument date or another scheduling action.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 4, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3