Skip to main content

No. 25-1028October Term 2025Dismissed

Docket 25-1028October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Porter Smith, Petitioner v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Case status

Current stage
Dismissed
Latest event
Dismissed
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision Released
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794, authorizes a private right of action for retaliation.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / Dismissed

Area

Dismissed Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Porter Smith asks the Supreme Court to decide whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act lets people sue for retaliation. The petition challenges a divided Sixth Circuit decision that said the law does not allow those lawsuits, unlike other federal appeals courts.

Argument

The case has not been scheduled for argument. The petition says the Sixth Circuit's 2-1 decision broke from every other circuit and conflicted with the Rehabilitation Act's direct use of the Americans with Disabilities Act's anti-retaliation rule.

Impact

The answer matters to people who say they were punished after complaining about disability discrimination. If the law is read differently by region, those people may have a lawsuit in some federal courts but not others.

What is Porter Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections about?

It asks whether the Rehabilitation Act lets a person sue for retaliation. The petition challenges a Sixth Circuit decision that said the law does not.

Who could be affected by Porter Smith?

People who say they were punished after complaining about disability discrimination could be affected. The answer could change whether those lawsuits are allowed in different federal courts.

What happens next in Porter Smith?

The Court must decide whether to take the case. If it does, the next big step will be written arguments and oral argument scheduling.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 25, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3