No. 20-287October Term 2020Decided May 24, 2021Updated May 24, 2021
Johnson v. Precythe
This case involves a Missouri death-row prisoner’s Eighth Amendment challenge to the State’s planned method of execution.
Case status
Decided · May 24, 2021
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released May 24, 2021
- What it's about
This case involves a Missouri death-row prisoner’s Eighth Amendment challenge to the State’s planned method of execution. He argues that the Eighth Circuit wrongly treated Bucklew v. Precythe as letting the State defeat his claim simply by giving an abstractly legitimate reason for rejecting his proposed alternative execution method.
Question presented
1. Whether Bucklew established a categorical rule that a State may obtain dismissal of an Eighth Amendment method-of-execution claim by proffering a reason for rejecting the plaintiff’s proposed alternative method of execution that is legitimate in the abstract, regardless of whether the plaintiff has plausibly alleged that the State’s proffered reason is not legitimate or sufficient on the facts of the case. 2. In the alternative, whether the court of appeals’ refusal to permit petitioner, after this Court’s decision in Bucklew was issued, to amend his complaint to propose a previously-used alternative method of execution warrants summary reversal.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit / Decision released May 24, 2021
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Timing
Decided May 24, 2021
The Court released its decision on May 24, 2021 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Activity
Docket activity2
Opinion added: Opinion
May 24, 2021 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Aug 28, 2020 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 25, 2026
- Method
- Methodology