Skip to main content

No. 20-287October Term 2020Decided May 24, 2021Updated May 24, 2021

Docket 20-287October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Johnson v. Precythe

This case involves a Missouri death-row prisoner’s Eighth Amendment challenge to the State’s planned method of execution.

Case status

Decided · May 24, 2021

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 24, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 24, 2021
What it's about

This case involves a Missouri death-row prisoner’s Eighth Amendment challenge to the State’s planned method of execution. He argues that the Eighth Circuit wrongly treated Bucklew v. Precythe as letting the State defeat his claim simply by giving an abstractly legitimate reason for rejecting his proposed alternative execution method.

Question presented

1. Whether Bucklew established a categorical rule that a State may obtain dismissal of an Eighth Amendment method-of-execution claim by proffering a reason for rejecting the plaintiff’s proposed alternative method of execution that is legitimate in the abstract, regardless of whether the plaintiff has plausibly alleged that the State’s proffered reason is not legitimate or sufficient on the facts of the case. 2. In the alternative, whether the court of appeals’ refusal to permit petitioner, after this Court’s decision in Bucklew was issued, to amend his complaint to propose a previously-used alternative method of execution warrants summary reversal.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit / Decision released May 24, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Timing

Decided May 24, 2021

The Court released its decision on May 24, 2021 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • Opinion added: Opinion

    May 24, 2021 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 28, 2020 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary-source trail available.
Note
Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 25, 2026
Primary materials5