Foster v. Chapman

1. Whether Mr. Foster was denied a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct where the assistant prosecutor intentionally provided an erroneous definition for unlawful imprisonment to the jury thereby creating confusion and an unreliable verdict? 2. Whether Mr. Foster's Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel was violated by trial counsel's failure to object to the assistant prosecutor's misconduct in providing an erroneous definition for the offense of unlawful imprisonment to the jury? 3. Whether there was ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to investigate exculpatory evidence? 4. Whether there was ineffective assistance of appellate counsel? 5. Whether there was prosecutor misconduct for violation of discovery rules by failure to produce requested police record? 6. Whether the prosecutor demonstrated misconduct by the use of perjured testimony to capitalize a conviction?