Smith v. Scott
In brief
The Supreme Court declined to hear Smith's petition, so it did not decide whether the officers had qualified immunity or violated clearly established Fourth Amendment rights.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 18, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case considers whether police officers are entitled to qualified immunity for using bodyweight pressure on a suspect before handcuffing them. It examines if this action violates clearly established Fourth Amendment rights.
- Who it affects
- For Rikisha S. Smith and Dr.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The petition came from proceedings in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Question presented
1. Whether police officers are entitled to qualified immunity for using bodyweight pressure on a suspect before handcuffing them. 2. Whether this action violates clearly established Fourth Amendment rights.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court's action on this petition is complete. This docket record contains no further Supreme Court step and no decision on the legal questions.
Why it matters
Scott, the denial left the qualified-immunity and Fourth Amendment questions unresolved in this case.
Documents
Opinions
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.