Skip to main content

No. 18-938October Term 2019Decided Jan 14, 2020

Docket 18-938October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC

If a bankruptcy court denies relief from the automatic stay, a party that wants to challenge that order must appeal promptly.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jan 14, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJan 14, 2020
What it's about

This bankruptcy case arose after a creditor tried to continue its breach-of-contract lawsuit against a company that had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Supreme Court considered whether a bankruptcy court’s order denying relief from the automatic stay is a final order that must be appealed right away.

Question presented

Whether an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1).

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / Decision released Jan 14, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court said a bankruptcy court order denying relief from the automatic stay is a final order that must be appealed right away. The dispute began after a creditor wanted to keep pursuing its breach-of-contract lawsuit against a company in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Vote

The Court decided the case on Jan. 14, 2020, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.

Impact

The decision tells creditors and debtors when the appeal clock starts in a bankruptcy fight. For example, a creditor denied permission to continue a lawsuit cannot wait until the whole bankruptcy case ends before appealing.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. In future bankruptcy cases, parties should treat a stay-relief denial as an immediately appealable order and follow the deadline for appeal.

What was the core dispute in Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC?

The case asked whether a bankruptcy court's denial of relief from the automatic stay counts as a final order. The Supreme Court said yes, so it must be appealed right away.

What real-world consequence does this decision have for bankruptcy parties?

It affects when creditors and debtors must file an appeal. Missing that deadline can forfeit review of the stay ruling.

What is the next procedural step after this Supreme Court decision?

There is no further Supreme Court step in this docket. Lower courts and future litigants must apply this rule when timing appeals in bankruptcy cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

If a bankruptcy court denies relief from the automatic stay, a party that wants to challenge that order must appeal promptly.

Impact

The decision tells creditors and debtors when the appeal clock starts in a bankruptcy fight. For example, a creditor denied permission to continue a lawsuit cannot wait until the whole bankruptcy case ends before appealing.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents