No. 18-938October Term 2019Decided Jan 14, 2020
Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC
If a bankruptcy court denies relief from the automatic stay, a party that wants to challenge that order must appeal promptly.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 14, 2020
- What it's about
This bankruptcy case arose after a creditor tried to continue its breach-of-contract lawsuit against a company that had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Supreme Court considered whether a bankruptcy court’s order denying relief from the automatic stay is a final order that must be appealed right away.
Question presented
Whether an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1).
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / Decision released Jan 14, 2020
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court said a bankruptcy court order denying relief from the automatic stay is a final order that must be appealed right away. The dispute began after a creditor wanted to keep pursuing its breach-of-contract lawsuit against a company in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Vote
The Court decided the case on Jan. 14, 2020, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.
Impact
The decision tells creditors and debtors when the appeal clock starts in a bankruptcy fight. For example, a creditor denied permission to continue a lawsuit cannot wait until the whole bankruptcy case ends before appealing.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. In future bankruptcy cases, parties should treat a stay-relief denial as an immediately appealable order and follow the deadline for appeal.
What was the core dispute in Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC?
The case asked whether a bankruptcy court's denial of relief from the automatic stay counts as a final order. The Supreme Court said yes, so it must be appealed right away.
What real-world consequence does this decision have for bankruptcy parties?
It affects when creditors and debtors must file an appeal. Missing that deadline can forfeit review of the stay ruling.
What is the next procedural step after this Supreme Court decision?
There is no further Supreme Court step in this docket. Lower courts and future litigants must apply this rule when timing appeals in bankruptcy cases.
Decision
What the Court decided
If a bankruptcy court denies relief from the automatic stay, a party that wants to challenge that order must appeal promptly.
Impact
The decision tells creditors and debtors when the appeal clock starts in a bankruptcy fight. For example, a creditor denied permission to continue a lawsuit cannot wait until the whole bankruptcy case ends before appealing.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 18-938
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jan 14, 2020
Petition
brief | Jan 14, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026