Skip to main content

Rogers v. Grewal

Updated Sep 5, 2026

In brief

The Court left the Third Circuit's decision upholding New Jersey's restriction in place without deciding the broader Second Amendment issue.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · June 15, 2020

What it’s about
The petitioners challenged New Jersey’s requirement that applicants show a particularized need before receiving a permit to carry a handgun in public for self-defense.
Who it affects
New Jersey residents seeking public-carry permits remain subject to the particularized-need requirement upheld by the Third Circuit. For example, a person seeking a permit for ordinary self-defense did not get a new Supreme Court decision changing that rule.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Thomas Rogers, et al., Petitioners v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court denied review, leaving the Third Circuit’s decision upholding New Jersey’s restriction in place without deciding the Second Amendment issue on the merits.

The case concerned whether the Second Amendment right to bear arms protects carrying a firearm outside the home for self-defense.

Question presented

Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry (i.e., “bear”) a firearm outside the home for self-defense.

What the Court decided

What's next

This docket action is finished. New Jersey's rule remains in effect under the Third Circuit's decision unless changed through another case or government action.

Documents

2

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Jun 15, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Dec 20, 2018 · Court records

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court do in Rogers v. Grewal?
The Court declined to hear the case on June 15, 2020. It did not decide whether the Second Amendment protects public carry for self-defense.
Who is affected by the Rogers v. Grewal outcome?
People applying for New Jersey public-carry permits remain subject to the state's particularized-need requirement. The Third Circuit's decision remains in place.
What happens next in Rogers v. Grewal?
The Supreme Court's docket action is complete. The lower-court result continues to govern this dispute.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis