No. 18-824October Term 2019Decided Jun 15, 2020
Thomas Rogers, et al., Petitioners v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
The Supreme Court did not answer the gun-carry question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 15, 2020
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Question presented
Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry (i.e., “bear”) a firearm outside the home for self-defense.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 15, 2020
- Area
Gun Rights
Briefing
What it's about
The case asked whether the Second Amendment protects carrying a gun outside the home for self-defense. On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court declined review, so it did not decide that question and left the Third Circuit's result in place.
Vote
The Court declined review on June 15, 2020, but the prompt does not provide a vote count or opinion lineup.
Impact
That meant New Jersey's challenged carry-permit rules were not changed by the Supreme Court in this case. For example, people seeking to carry a handgun in New Jersey still had to follow the lower court's rule, not a new nationwide rule from the Supreme Court.
What's next
This docket action is over at the Supreme Court. The practical result is that the Third Circuit's judgment remained in effect unless changed in a different case or by lawmakers.
What was the main dispute in Rogers v. Grewal?
The petition asked whether the Second Amendment protects carrying a firearm outside the home for self-defense. The Supreme Court did not answer that question in this case.
Who was affected by the Court's action?
People seeking permits to carry handguns in New Jersey were affected most directly. They remained subject to the existing lower-court-approved rules.
What was the next procedural step after June 15, 2020?
There was no further Supreme Court step in this docket. The case ended there, with the lower court's result left in place.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Supreme Court did not answer the gun-carry question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.
Impact
That meant New Jersey's challenged carry-permit rules were not changed by the Supreme Court in this case. For example, people seeking to carry a handgun in New Jersey still had to follow the lower court's rule, not a new nationwide rule from the Supreme Court.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology