Skip to main content

No. 18-824October Term 2019Decided Jun 15, 2020

Docket 18-824October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Thomas Rogers, et al., Petitioners v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.

The Supreme Court did not answer the gun-carry question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 15, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 15, 2020
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Question presented

Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry (i.e., “bear”) a firearm outside the home for self-defense.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 15, 2020

Area

Gun Rights

Briefing

What it's about

The case asked whether the Second Amendment protects carrying a gun outside the home for self-defense. On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court declined review, so it did not decide that question and left the Third Circuit's result in place.

Vote

The Court declined review on June 15, 2020, but the prompt does not provide a vote count or opinion lineup.

Impact

That meant New Jersey's challenged carry-permit rules were not changed by the Supreme Court in this case. For example, people seeking to carry a handgun in New Jersey still had to follow the lower court's rule, not a new nationwide rule from the Supreme Court.

What's next

This docket action is over at the Supreme Court. The practical result is that the Third Circuit's judgment remained in effect unless changed in a different case or by lawmakers.

What was the main dispute in Rogers v. Grewal?

The petition asked whether the Second Amendment protects carrying a firearm outside the home for self-defense. The Supreme Court did not answer that question in this case.

Who was affected by the Court's action?

People seeking permits to carry handguns in New Jersey were affected most directly. They remained subject to the existing lower-court-approved rules.

What was the next procedural step after June 15, 2020?

There was no further Supreme Court step in this docket. The case ended there, with the lower court's result left in place.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court did not answer the gun-carry question here; it simply chose not to hear the case.

Impact

That meant New Jersey's challenged carry-permit rules were not changed by the Supreme Court in this case. For example, people seeking to carry a handgun in New Jersey still had to follow the lower court's rule, not a new nationwide rule from the Supreme Court.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents