Skip to main content

Medicare appeal deadlines

Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Court overturned the D.C. Circuit’s ruling: the PRRB’s 180-day deadline does not remove its legal power to hear appeals, and good-cause extensions under the Secretary’s rule are allowed.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · January 22, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
Hospitals sought more time to challenge Medicare payment decisions before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) after missing its 180-day deadline. The Supreme Court overturned the D.C.
Who it affects
For health care providers appealing Medicare payment decisions, the 180-day deadline is not an absolute bar; the Secretary’s rule permits good-cause extensions.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Auburn Regional Medical Center
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back (reversed and remanded), deciding that the deadline does not strip the Board of legal power to hear an appeal (is not “jurisdictional”) and that the Secretary’s regulation allowing good-cause extensions of up to three years is permitted by the law.

The PRRB hears health care providers’ challenges to Medicare payment decisions.

Question presented

Is the statute of limitations for filing a claim with the PRRB for Medicare payments subject to tolling for good cause?

What the Court decided

Holding

1. The 180-day limitation in §1395 oo (a)(3) is not “jurisdictional.” 2. The Secretary’s regulation is a permissible interpretation of §1395 oo (a)(3). 642 F. 3d 1145, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

The Court said the 180-day limit does not take away the PRRB’s legal power to hear an appeal, and the Secretary’s rule allowing good-cause extensions is a permitted reading of the law.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  7. Sotomayoralso wrote separately
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the D.C. Circuit, which must apply the Supreme Court’s ruling. The decision does not itself determine whether a particular provider qualifies for an extension.

Documents

2

Opinions

Audio

View the full docket on supremecourt.gov

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Sebelius

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Sebelius

    Jan 22, 2013 · Court records

More questions

1
How long can a good-cause extension last?
The Secretary’s regulation allows extensions of up to three years.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis