Skip to main content

Sixth Amendment review after remand

Tara Sheneva Williams v. Johnson

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court did not decide whether Williams' rights were violated; it wiped out the Ninth Circuit's ruling and sent her claim back for reconsideration.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · July 1, 2014 · Per curiam

What it’s about
Tara Williams claimed that dismissing a juror who disagreed with others at her capital murder trial violated her Sixth Amendment rights.
Who it affects
The Ninth Circuit must reconsider Williams' claim under that federal standard; the Supreme Court did not decide whether the juror's dismissal violated her rights.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Tara Sheneva Williams v. Deborah K. Johnson, Acting Warden
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court wiped out the Ninth Circuit’s ruling (vacated it) and sent the case back (remanded it) to reconsider her claim under the federal rule for reviewing state-court decisions in prisoner cases; it did not decide whether her rights were violated.

The dispute concerns how a federal court should review Williams' constitutional claim about the juror's dismissal.

Question presented

1. Did the Supreme Court's decision to reverse and remand the case bar further review of Williams' Sixth Amendment claim? 2. Did the Court's decision not to hear arguments on the second question in Williams' petition, regarding the Sixth Amendment issue, and not address the question in the opinion allow that question to be remanded for consideration by a lower court by default?

What the Court decided

Holding

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for consideration of petitioner’s Sixth Amendment claim under the standard set forth in 28 U.

Result
Vacated

What's next

The Ninth Circuit is to reconsider Williams' Sixth Amendment claim under the federal standard for reviewing state-court decisions in prisoner cases.

Documents

1

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 3 more
  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Williams

    Jul 1, 2014 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis