Skip to main content

Forfeiture for others' gains

Cid v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court sent Cid’s case back for reconsideration under Hunter, without deciding whether her forfeiture order can stand.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · November 9, 2026

What it’s about
Cid's $6,554,250 forfeiture was based on proceeds the district court said she jointly obtained with co-conspirators; the Eleventh Circuit threw out her appeal under her plea-agreement waiver.
Who it affects
The Eleventh Circuit must reconsider Cid’s appeal in light of Hunter, but the Supreme Court did not decide whether her forfeiture can stand.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Heidi Cid, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court granted review, wiped out that judgment (vacated it), and sent the case back (remanded) to reconsider under Hunter, without deciding whether the forfeiture was lawful.

The district court ordered $6,554,250 in forfeiture based on proceeds it said Cid jointly obtained with co-conspirators. The Eleventh Circuit threw out Cid’s appeal under the waiver in her plea agreement.

The case concerns whether a plea-agreement appeal waiver can block review of a criminal forfeiture order that includes proceeds a defendant did not personally obtain.

Question presented

Whether, in light of Hunter, an appeal waiver may be enforced to bar review of a criminal forfeiture order imposing joint-and-several liability for proceeds the defendant did not obtain—a form of forfeiture that 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A), as construed in Honeycutt v. United States, does not authorize.

What the Court decided

Holding

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hunter v. United States, 608 U. S. 713 (2026).

Result
Vacated

What's next

The Eleventh Circuit will reconsider the case in light of Hunter v. United States.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 16, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis