Skip to main content

Appealing a longer sentence

Pedro Jose Silva Ochoa v. United States

Updated Oct 13, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court sent Ochoa's case back for another look in light of Hunter, but did not decide whether his plea waiver barred his appeal.

Where it stands
Case remanded

Remanded · October 13, 2026

What it’s about
Ochoa disputed whether his plea waiver barred an appeal of a sentence above his defense’s proposed guideline range, including when the judge advised him of an appeal right without government objection.
Who it affects
The Eleventh Circuit must reconsider Ochoa's case in light of Hunter; the Supreme Court did not decide whether the waiver blocked his appeal.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Pedro Jose Silva Ochoa v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, wiped out the Eleventh Circuit judgment (vacated it), and sent the case back (remanded it) for reconsideration in light of Hunter, without deciding the questions.

Ochoa's appeal waiver was part of his guilty plea; his dispute concerns which sentencing challenges the waiver covered.

Question presented

1. Whether a defendant’s challenge to a sentence exceeding the guideline range advocated by the defense at sentencing survived an appeal waiver that expressly recognized the defendant’s right to argue against guideline enhancements at sentencing and the waiver did not explicitly state that any resulting enhancements could not be appealed? 2. Whether an appeal waiver applies when the sentencing judge advises the defendant of the right to appeal without a government objection?

What the Court decided

Holding

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hunter v. United States, 608 U. S. 713 (2026).

Result
Remanded

What's next

The Eleventh Circuit will reconsider Ochoa's case in light of Hunter v. United States.

Documents

1

Docket activity

13
  • New analysis added

    Oct 13, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 13, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 13, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: term, title

    Oct 13, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Oct 13, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 13, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 13, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 17, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • New analysis added

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 13, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis