Skip to main content

Challenging confessions before a plea

Premo v. Randy Joseph Moore

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the Ninth Circuit's order giving Moore relief and sent the case back, leaving him without the relief that court had ordered.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 8-0 · January 19, 2011 · Opinion by Justice Kennedy

What it’s about
Randy Moore argued that his lawyer should have asked the court to exclude his confession before he pleaded no contest to murder.
Who it affects
Moore was not entitled to the relief from imprisonment that the Ninth Circuit had ordered.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary v. Randy Joseph Moore
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court overturned the Ninth Circuit’s order granting Moore relief in his challenge to his imprisonment and sent the case back (reversed and remanded), ruling he was not entitled to that relief.

Moore raised the confession issue in a federal challenge to his imprisonment after entering a no-contest plea to murder.

Question presented

Does a lawyer provide inadequate representation by failing to seek suppression of a client's confession before he pleads no contest to murder?

What the Court decided

Holding

Moore was not entitled to the habeas relief ordered by the Ninth Circuit. 574 F. 3d 1092, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

Justice Ginsburg agreed with the result for a different reason: she said Moore had not shown a reasonable chance that, if better informed, he would have rejected the plea and gone to trial.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Thomas
  3. Scalia
  4. Kennedywrote the opinion
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Roberts
  7. Alito
Concurring · 1agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Ginsburgwrote separately
8 justices joined the judgment (1 writing separately).

What's next

The Ninth Circuit must take up the case again in light of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Premo

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Premo

    Jan 19, 2011 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis