Head-to-head
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor, et al. vs. The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al. vs. Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al., Petitioners v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
Immigration cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
The matchup
Docket 24-724The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor, et al.DecidedDecided Feb 24, 2026Docket 24-758The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.DecidedDecided Feb 25, 2026Docket 24-777Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al., Petitioners v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney GeneralDecidedDecided Mar 4, 2026
Relationship
- Shared issue
- Immigration
- Why compared
- Reviewed Immigration tags connect these current-term public cases.
Questions presented
- The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor, et al.
- Must a federal court’s final judgment be set aside if the case did not have complete diversity when it was removed from state court, and can a plaintiff block diversity jurisdiction by updating the complaint after removal to include a valid claim against a nondiverse defendant?
- The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
- Is a pretrial order denying a government contractor's claim to protection under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine?
- Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al., Petitioners v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
- Must a federal court of appeals defer to the BIA’s judgment that a given set of undisputed facts does not demonstrate mistreatment severe enough to constitute “persecution” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)?
Go deeper
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.