Skip to main content

No. 24-758October Term 2025Decided Feb 25, 2026Updated Sep 2, 2026

Docket 24-758October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

The GEO Group v. Menocal

The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.

GEO Group must wait until final judgment before appealing the rejection of its Yearsley defense.

Case status

Decided 9-0 · February 25, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Feb 25, 2026
Case AcceptedJun 2, 2025
Arguments HeardNov 10, 2025
Decision ReleasedFeb 25, 2026
What it's about

The Supreme Court held that a private company operating an immigration detention facility cannot take an immediate appeal from an order denying its defense under Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co. Justice Kagan wrote for the Court, ruling that Yearsley provides a defense to liability, not immunity from suit, so GEO Group must await final judgment before appealing.

Question presented

Is a pretrial order denying a government contractor's claim to protection under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit / Decision released Feb 25, 2026

Area

Immigration

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

GEO Group must wait until final judgment before appealing the rejection of its Yearsley defense.

Impact

Former Aurora detainees can continue their case after GEO’s Yearsley defense is rejected. A Yearsley defense (a claim that the government lawfully authorized and directed conduct) protects contractors from liability. Menocal’s class action may proceed to trial without GEO’s immediate appeal. GEO may appeal after final judgment (the case’s end). Contractors must generally wait for final judgment before appealing a rejected Yearsley defense.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

The Court decided that GEO Group cannot immediately appeal a pretrial order rejecting its Yearsley defense. Yearsley is a defense for federal contractors acting under lawful government authorization, not protection from having to face a lawsuit.

Vote

Justice Kagan wrote the 9–0 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Barrett, Jackson, and Kavanaugh; Justices Alito and Thomas concurred.

Justice Kagan wrote for the Court. The vote count and other opinion lineup details were not provided.

Yearsley provides a defense to liability, not immunity from suit.

Justice Kagan(majority)

Impact

People suing GEO and other federal contractors can continue their cases without waiting for a separate appeal. For example, a contractor operating a detention facility must generally litigate through final judgment before appealing this defense.

What's next

The underlying case can proceed in the normal course in lower court. GEO may raise its Yearsley defense in an appeal after final judgment.

What did the Supreme Court rule in GEO Group v. Menocal?

The Court said GEO cannot immediately appeal the denial of its Yearsley defense. It must wait for final judgment before appealing.

Who is affected by the GEO Group v. Menocal decision?

Federal contractors and people suing them are affected. Contractors generally cannot pause a case for an immediate appeal after a Yearsley defense is rejected.

What happens next in GEO Group v. Menocal?

The underlying lawsuit proceeds in lower court. GEO can seek review of its Yearsley defense after final judgment.

Timing

Decided February 25, 2026

The Court released its decision 107 days after oral argument on November 10, 2025. The median for cases argued in November is 160 days.

Based on 35 merits cases argued in November since 1995.Argument and decision days

Activity

Docket activity8
  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Feb 25, 2026 | Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - EK

    Feb 25, 2026 | Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Menocal

    Nov 10, 2025 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 13, 2025 | Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records