Cases compared
Gator's Custom Guns, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Washington vs. Virginia Duncan, et al., Petitioners v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California vs. National Association for Gun Rights, et al., Petitioners v. Ned Lamont, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Connecticut, et al.
Gun Rights cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
No. 25-153No. 25-198No. 25-421
Side by side
| Fact | Gator's Custom Guns, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Washington | Virginia Duncan, et al., Petitioners v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California | National Association for Gun Rights, et al., Petitioners v. Ned Lamont, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Connecticut, et al. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docket | 25-153 | 25-198 | 25-421 |
| Status | Before Arguments | Before Arguments | Before Arguments |
| Date | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) |
| Question presented | 1. Whether the District’s ban on firearm magazines capable of holding “more than 10 rounds of ammunition” violates the Second Amendment, either facially or as applied, and, if so, which of appellant’s convictions should be reversed as a result of that constitutional infirmity? 2. Whether the District’s licensing and registration requirements violate the Second Amendment? | Whether the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to possess these ubiquitous arms. | Whether magazines are “Arms” within the meaning of the Second Amendment? |
| Summary | Gator’s Custom Guns and Walter Wentz ask the Supreme Court to review Washington’s restrictions on ammunition magazines that can hold more than ten rounds. The case concerns whether those magazines are protected “Arms” under the Second Amendment. | This case challenges California’s ban on firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, including the law’s requirement that owners give up magazines they had lawfully acquired. The petitioners argue that these magazines are commonly owned for lawful purposes and therefore protected by the Second Amendment. | This case challenges Connecticut’s ban on possession of AR-15-style rifles and firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. The petitioners argue that these firearms and magazines are commonly owned for lawful purposes and therefore protected by the Second Amendment. |
Relationship
- Shared issue
- Gun Rights
- Why compared
- Reviewed Gun Rights tags connect these current-term public cases.
Related
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.