Head-to-head
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al., Petitioners v. Mosaic Health, Inc., et al. vs. Sheila Foster, Petitioner v. Robert Jesel, et al. vs. Sheila Hallman-Warner, Petitioner v. Bluefield State College Board of Governors
Business and Regulation cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.
The matchup
Docket 25-1070AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al., Petitioners v. Mosaic Health, Inc., et al.Before argumentOctober Term 2025Docket 25-7506Sheila Foster, Petitioner v. Robert Jesel, et al.Before argumentOctober Term 2025Docket 25-7657Sheila Hallman-Warner, Petitioner v. Bluefield State College Board of GovernorsBefore argumentOctober Term 2025
Relationship
- Shared issue
- Business and Regulation
- Why compared
- Reviewed Business and Regulation tags connect these current-term public cases.
Questions presented
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al., Petitioners v. Mosaic Health, Inc., et al.
- 1. Whether Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), which bars antitrust claims by indirect purchasers and sellers, applies to a claim of “lost profit” damages based on indirect purchases or sales that were not made due to the alleged conspiracy? 2. Whether the allegation that businesses had an “opportunity to conspire,” such as through joint lobbying and participation in a trade association, plausibly suggests an antitrust conspiracy?
- Sheila Foster, Petitioner v. Robert Jesel, et al.
- 1. Whether the six-month statute of limitations for a duty-of-fair-representation claim under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., is subject to equitable tolling when a union and its representatives repeatedly misrepresent that they are pursuing arbitration of an employee's grievance, thereby inducing the employee's reasonable delay in filing suit? 2. Whether a district court abuses its discretion by dismissing a complaint with prejudice on statute-of-limitations grounds, without permitting discovery or leave to amend, when the plaintiff has pleaded specific facts showing ongoing union misrepresentations and diligent inquiry that could support tolling under Del Costello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (1983), and Fifth Circuit precedent? 3. Whether the Railway Labor Act's duty-of-fair-representation doctrine preempts state-law claims for breach of contract and misrepresentation when those claims arise solely from a union's failure to perform representational duties expressly set forth in a collective-bargaining agreement, or whether courts may instead apply uniform federal standards without selective invocation of preemption or choice-of-law principles?
- Sheila Hallman-Warner, Petitioner v. Bluefield State College Board of Governors
- 1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state supreme court to affirm enforcement of a settlement agreement while declining to address properly raised federal constitutional claims challenging retaliation, fraud, and deprivation of due process. 2. Whether due process is violated when a state court refuses to consider newly obtained forensic evidence of alleged fraud in the execution of a settlement agreement. 3. Whether disabled pro se litigants are denied meaningful access to the courts when state courts fail to compel evidence, and fail to address constitutional claims. 4. Whether enforcement of a settlement agreement under state contract law principles may bar consideration of preserved federal constitutional claims where the petitioner alleges coercion arising from retaliatory governmental conduct.
Go deeper
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.