Skip to main content

Right to own assault rifles

Gino Mario Recchia v. Campbell

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Gino Mario Recchia III and Mass Armament ask the Supreme Court to review their challenge to a Massachusetts law involving AR-15-style semiautomatic rifles, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment and limits trade between states.
What's at stake
Recchia and Mass Armament's claims remain unresolved; the Supreme Court has not agreed to hear them.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

Their petition is pending; the Court has not agreed to hear it or decided those questions.

The petition asks whether the Second Amendment protects possession of certain semiautomatic rifles and whether state laws may restrict trade between states.

Question presented

1. Whether the Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to possess AR-15-platform and similar semiautomatic rifles, and whether the text of the Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to possess weapons similar to those carried by regular military soldiers. 2. Whether Massachusetts has violated the dormant Commerce Clause by enacting a law that affects commerce among the several States when Congress has de facto allowed that commerce to occur.

What happens next

The petition was distributed for the Court's Nov. 13, 2026 conference. That does not mean the Court has agreed to hear it or guarantee an order date.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 15, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis