Skip to main content

Federal oversight of foster care

Morrisey v. Jonathan R., Minor, by Next Friend, Sarah Dixon

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
West Virginia officials ask the Supreme Court to review a challenge to the state’s foster-care system, arguing that the requested relief would require a federal court to take over managing a state agency.
What's at stake
The minor and other plaintiffs' challenge to West Virginia's foster-care system remains unresolved; the Supreme Court has not agreed to review it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

They also ask whether an appeals court may review class certification on a cross-appeal; the petition was distributed for a conference, but that is not a decision to hear the case.

The petition also asks about federal court oversight of a state agency and whether an appeals court may review a class-certification order on a cross-appeal.

Question presented

1. Is a claim redressable when the only relief said to be effective requires a federal court to become the “manager or policy planner” of a state agency? 2. When a class-certification order merges into a final judgment, does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) nonetheless bar an appellate court from reviewing that order on a cross-appeal from the judgment?

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the petition. It was distributed for a Nov. 6, 2026 conference, but that does not mean the Court granted review or guarantee an order date.

Documents

1

Docket activity

16
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 29, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 29, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • New document added

    Oct 29, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 28, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is the officials' question about relief?
They ask whether the requested relief can work without a federal court taking on management or policy planning for a state agency.
What is the question about class certification?
The officials ask whether an appeals court may review a class-certification order, which decides whether claims can proceed as a group, on a cross-appeal after it becomes part of the final judgment.
When is oral argument scheduled?
It has not been scheduled, and the Court has not agreed to hear the case.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis