No. 25-7502October Term 2025Dismissed
In Re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal
This petition challenges California’s handling of Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal’s criminal case.
Case status
- Current stage
- Dismissed
- Latest event
- Dismissed
- Decision timing
- No window until argument is scheduled.
- What it's about
This petition challenges California’s handling of Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal’s criminal case. He argues that the state lacked probable cause to charge or keep him in custody and that delays or suspensions of the case for pandemic-related and mental-health reasons violated the Constitution and the protections of habeas corpus.
Question presented
1. Can the State of California with moral turpitude & under the color of the law in coordination with multiple government actors violate the rules of Habeas Corpus? Aren’t these actions slavery, murder, and terrorism of the victims by their assailants? 2. Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Pandemic to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus? 3. Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Mental Health to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus?
- Case path
Dismissed
- Area
Criminal Procedure
Briefing
What it's about
This petition asks the Supreme Court to review Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal’s challenge to California’s handling of his criminal case. He says the state lacked enough evidence to charge or keep him in custody and that pandemic-related and mental-health delays violated habeas corpus (the right to challenge unlawful detention).
Argument
The case is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. The petition says California lacked enough evidence to bring the case and used pandemic-related and mental-health delays in ways that violated habeas corpus.
Impact
The case could affect how defendants challenge long criminal-case delays while they remain in custody. For example, it matters to someone who says the state filed charges without enough evidence and then paused the case for health-related reasons.
What is In Re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal about?
The petition challenges California’s handling of a criminal case. It says the state lacked enough evidence and used delays that violated the right to challenge detention.
Who could be affected if the Court takes this case?
Defendants who say they were charged without enough evidence and then faced long delays could be affected. Courts handling pauses tied to health issues could also watch closely.
What happens next in In Re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal?
Watch for oral argument or another scheduling move from the Supreme Court. No decision timing is available yet.
Related cases
Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 23, 2026
- Method
- Methodology