Skip to main content

No. 25-7502October Term 2025DismissedUpdated Sep 3, 2026

Docket 25-7502October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

In Re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal, Petitioner

This petition challenges California’s handling of Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal’s criminal case.

Case status

Current stage
Dismissed
Latest event
Dismissed
Next
Argument not yet scheduledArgument expected next term.
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision Released
What it's about

This petition challenges California’s handling of Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal’s criminal case. He argues that the state lacked probable cause to charge or keep him in custody and that delays or suspensions of the case for pandemic-related and mental-health reasons violated the Constitution and the protections of habeas corpus.

Question presented

1. Can the State of California with moral turpitude & under the color of the law in coordination with multiple government actors violate the rules of Habeas Corpus? Aren’t these actions slavery, murder, and terrorism of the victims by their assailants? 2. Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Pandemic to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus? 3. Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Mental Health to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus?

Case path

Dismissed

Area

Criminal Procedure

Briefing

What it's about

Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal challenges California's handling of his criminal case. He says the state lacked probable cause and that pandemic-related and mental-health delays violated habeas corpus protections (the right to ask a court to review detention).

Argument

Oral argument has not been scheduled. Dhaliwal argues that California lacked probable cause and improperly delayed or suspended his case.

Impact

The case raises questions about protections for people held while criminal cases are delayed or paused. For example, an accused person could argue that extended custody without sufficient legal basis violates constitutional safeguards.

What's next

No decision window is set. Watch for oral argument or another scheduling move from the Court.

What is Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal challenging?

He challenges California's criminal-case handling, including the claimed lack of probable cause and delays tied to the pandemic and mental-health issues.

Who could be affected by the Dhaliwal case?

People held during delayed criminal cases could be affected if courts address when detention and case suspensions violate constitutional protections.

What happens next in In re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal?

Oral argument has not been scheduled. The next development would be an argument date or another scheduling action by the Court.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    May 8, 2026 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3