No. 25-6099October Term 2025Dismissed
Christopher J. Rahaim, Petitioner v. Ken Burke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Florida, et al.
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Case status
- Current stage
- Dismissed
- Latest event
- Dismissed
- Decision timing
- No window until argument is scheduled.
- What it's about
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Question presented
Should the established, freestanding public records rights be revisited for settling the states conflicting, questionable lawful authority to fraudulently conceal evidence that proves substantive, procedural rights violations falsely imprisoning a criminal defendant, the state court lacking any compelling government interest, evidentiary privilege or subject matter?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Dismissed
- Area
Dismissed Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
Christopher J. Rahaim has asked the Supreme Court to review a case from the Eleventh Circuit about access to public records. He argues the Court should revisit public-records rights when a state allegedly conceals evidence that he says would show rights violations and false imprisonment in a criminal case.
Argument
The case is still at the petition stage, and oral argument has not been scheduled. The petition asks the justices to revisit public-records rights in the setting of alleged concealed evidence in a criminal case.
Impact
If the Court takes the case, it could affect how criminal defendants try to get records they believe were concealed by state officials. For example, it could matter to a prisoner seeking court records that he says show serious mistakes in his case.
What is at stake in Rahaim v. Burke?
The petition asks whether the Court should revisit public-records rights when a state allegedly conceals evidence in a criminal case. Rahaim says the hidden material would show rights violations.
Who could be affected if the Court takes this case?
Criminal defendants seeking records could be affected, along with clerks and other state officials who control access to court materials. The issue matters most when someone says records show serious errors.
What happens next in Christopher J. Rahaim v. Burke?
The Court has not scheduled argument. Watch for a scheduling move or another order showing whether the petition advances.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 23, 2026
- Method
- Methodology