No. 24-568October Term 2025Decided Jan 14, 2026
Michael J. Bost, et al., Petitioners v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.
The Supreme Court held 7-2 that a candidate for office has standing to challenge election rules governing the counting of votes.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 14, 2026
- What it's about
The Supreme Court held 7-2 that a candidate for office has standing to challenge election rules governing the counting of votes. Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the majority, reversing the lower courts' dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Illinois' practice of counting mail-in ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day.
Question presented
Do federal candidates have Article III standing to challenge state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be received and counted for two weeks after Election Day based on claims that such laws dilute their votes and force them to incur additional campaign expenses for extended ballot monitoring?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released Jan 14, 2026
- Area
Elections
Decision
What the Court decided
This case challenged Illinois’s rule counting mail ballots received within two weeks after Election Day. The candidates argued federal law sets Election Day and bars later-counted ballots. The Court held Congressman Bost had standing (the right to sue) to challenge vote-counting rules in his election.
Impact
Candidates for federal office are most directly affected. The Court said they have standing (a legal right to sue) over vote-counting rules in their elections. For example, an Illinois candidate can challenge counting mail ballots received within two weeks after Election Day. This could lead to more lawsuits over state election rules on counting votes. It also means courts may reach those disputes instead of dismissing them for lack of standing.
Not official Court text.
Vote
Other opinions
Concurring
Dissenting
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided January 14, 2026
The Court released its decision 98 days after oral argument on October 8, 2025. The median for cases argued in October is 138 days.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-568
docket | Jul 23, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 23, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
opinion
opinion | Jan 14, 2026
Opinion of the Court - R
opinion | Jan 14, 2026
Oral Arguments - Bost
audio | Oct 8, 2025
Petition
brief | Nov 19, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026