Skip to main content

No. 24-568October Term 2025Decided Jan 14, 2026

Docket 24-568October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Michael J. Bost, et al., Petitioners v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.

The Supreme Court held 7-2 that a candidate for office has standing to challenge election rules governing the counting of votes.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jan 14, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardOct 8, 2025
Decision ReleasedJan 14, 2026
What it's about

The Supreme Court held 7-2 that a candidate for office has standing to challenge election rules governing the counting of votes. Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the majority, reversing the lower courts' dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Illinois' practice of counting mail-in ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day.

Question presented

Do federal candidates have Article III standing to challenge state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be received and counted for two weeks after Election Day based on claims that such laws dilute their votes and force them to incur additional campaign expenses for extended ballot monitoring?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released Jan 14, 2026

Area

Elections

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This case challenged Illinois’s rule counting mail ballots received within two weeks after Election Day. The candidates argued federal law sets Election Day and bars later-counted ballots. The Court held Congressman Bost had standing (the right to sue) to challenge vote-counting rules in his election.

Impact

Candidates for federal office are most directly affected. The Court said they have standing (a legal right to sue) over vote-counting rules in their elections. For example, an Illinois candidate can challenge counting mail ballots received within two weeks after Election Day. This could lead to more lawsuits over state election rules on counting votes. It also means courts may reach those disputes instead of dismissing them for lack of standing.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided January 14, 2026

The Court released its decision 98 days after oral argument on October 8, 2025. The median for cases argued in October is 138 days.

Based on 28 merits cases argued in October since 1995.Argument and decision days