No. 25-1422October Term 2025Petition PendingUpdated Sep 2, 2026
Sprint Corporation, nka Sprint v. Federal Communications Commission
Sprint Corporation, nka Sprint LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.
Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review Federal Communications Commission forfeiture orders concerning the handling of mobile-device location information.
Case status
- Current stage
- Petition Pending
- Latest event
- Petition pending
- Next
- Awaiting an order on the petitionNo decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
- What it's about
Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review Federal Communications Commission forfeiture orders concerning the handling of mobile-device location information. The petition argues that the D.C. Circuit should reconsider its ruling in light of FCC v. AT&T and raises statutory questions about what counts as protected location information and how violations may be counted for penalties.
Question presented
1. Whether this Court should, at minimum, grant, vacate, and remand in light of AT&T and the government’s concessions in that case. 2. Whether “location” CPNI under § 222 refers only to call-location information, not other information about the location of a mobile device. 3. Whether the number of “continuing violations” arising from a single failure to act under § 503(b) is a legal question for courts to decide, without deferring to the FCC’s conclusion.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Petition pending
- Area
Petition for review pending
Briefing
What it's about
Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review FCC forfeiture orders concerning customer proprietary network information, including mobile-device location information. The petition also asks whether courts, rather than the FCC, should decide how many continuing violations result from one failure to act.
Argument
The case is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. Sprint argues that the lower-court decision should be reconsidered in light of AT&T and the government's concessions in that case.
Impact
The case could affect when wireless companies face FCC financial penalties for handling customer information. For example, it could shape whether information about a phone's location is protected under this part of the Communications Act.
What's next
The next step is a scheduling move or a decision on certiorari (whether the Court will hear the case). No decision window is available yet.
What is at stake in Sprint v. FCC?
The case concerns FCC penalties, the legal force of FCC orders, and whether mobile-device location information is protected customer information.
Who could be affected by Sprint v. FCC?
Wireless providers could face different enforcement risks. Their customers could be affected by how federal law treats information about a mobile device's location.
What happens next in Sprint v. FCC?
The Court may schedule oral argument or decide whether to grant certiorari, meaning whether it will hear the case.
Documents
Activity
Docket activity3
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
Brief added: Petition
Jun 22, 2026 | Court records
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Apr 2, 2026 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology