Skip to main content

No. 25-1422October Term 2025Petition PendingUpdated Sep 2, 2026

Docket 25-1422October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Sprint Corporation, nka Sprint v. Federal Communications Commission

Sprint Corporation, nka Sprint LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review Federal Communications Commission forfeiture orders concerning the handling of mobile-device location information.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Next
Awaiting an order on the petitionNo decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review Federal Communications Commission forfeiture orders concerning the handling of mobile-device location information. The petition argues that the D.C. Circuit should reconsider its ruling in light of FCC v. AT&T and raises statutory questions about what counts as protected location information and how violations may be counted for penalties.

Question presented

1. Whether this Court should, at minimum, grant, vacate, and remand in light of AT&T and the government’s concessions in that case. 2. Whether “location” CPNI under § 222 refers only to call-location information, not other information about the location of a mobile device. 3. Whether the number of “continuing violations” arising from a single failure to act under § 503(b) is a legal question for courts to decide, without deferring to the FCC’s conclusion.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Petition for review pending

Briefing

What it's about

Sprint asks the Supreme Court to review FCC forfeiture orders concerning customer proprietary network information, including mobile-device location information. The petition also asks whether courts, rather than the FCC, should decide how many continuing violations result from one failure to act.

Argument

The case is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. Sprint argues that the lower-court decision should be reconsidered in light of AT&T and the government's concessions in that case.

Impact

The case could affect when wireless companies face FCC financial penalties for handling customer information. For example, it could shape whether information about a phone's location is protected under this part of the Communications Act.

What's next

The next step is a scheduling move or a decision on certiorari (whether the Court will hear the case). No decision window is available yet.

What is at stake in Sprint v. FCC?

The case concerns FCC penalties, the legal force of FCC orders, and whether mobile-device location information is protected customer information.

Who could be affected by Sprint v. FCC?

Wireless providers could face different enforcement risks. Their customers could be affected by how federal law treats information about a mobile device's location.

What happens next in Sprint v. FCC?

The Court may schedule oral argument or decide whether to grant certiorari, meaning whether it will hear the case.

Activity

Docket activity3
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 22, 2026 | Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Apr 2, 2026 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 2, 2026
Primary materials6
Context reporting2