Skip to main content

No. 25-1393October Term 2025Petition PendingUpdated Sep 2, 2026

Docket 25-1393October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

In Re Palani Karupaiyan, Petitioner

This pending petition asks the Supreme Court to use its extraordinary authority to make sweeping changes to the Constitution and to the way federal and state judges are chosen, promoted, and retired.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Next
Awaiting an order on the petitionNo decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

This pending petition asks the Supreme Court to use its extraordinary authority to make sweeping changes to the Constitution and to the way federal and state judges are chosen, promoted, and retired. Among other things, the petitioner seeks recognition of parental rights as constitutional rights and orders changing how Supreme Court justices and other judges are appointed.

Question presented

1. Should this Court grant a Writ against United States that make amendment to the Constitution that Parental rights are Constitutional rights? 2. Should this Court grant an Order that (i) US Govt/President should not appoint the US Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice (ii) Thru Collegium process 51 USCA Judges should be appointed to US Supreme Court for 5 years, and they should retire at 70 whichever comes 1st. (iii) Most experienced USSC’s Associated Justice should be promoted to Chief Justice when Chief Justice retire or vacant (iv) Invalidate the Judge Brown appointment to US Supreme Court? 3. Should this Court grant an Order that USCA Judges and NJ’s Apex Court Judges should be appointed by US govt thru US Supreme Court’s Collegium process by inviting nationwide applicants? 4. Should this Court grant an Order that (i) Circuit level?

Case path

Petition pending

Area

Petition for review pending

Briefing

What it's about

Palani Karupaiyan asks the Supreme Court to make sweeping changes to the Constitution and to how federal and state judges are selected. The petition also seeks recognition of parental rights as constitutional rights.

Argument

The case is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

Impact

If considered, the requests could affect parents and the selection, promotion, and retirement of judges nationwide. For example, the petition seeks a new process for choosing Supreme Court justices instead of presidential appointments.

What's next

Watch for a scheduling order, including whether the Court sets oral argument or takes another action. No decision window is available yet.

What is at stake in In Re Palani Karupaiyan?

The petition seeks recognition of parental rights as constitutional rights and broad changes to judicial selection and retirement systems.

Who could be affected by the requested changes?

Parents, judicial applicants, sitting judges, and the public could be affected if the requested nationwide changes were considered or adopted.

What happens next in In Re Palani Karupaiyan?

The Court could issue a scheduling order or take another procedural step. Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Dec 12, 2025 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 2, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3