Skip to main content

No. 25-1368October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-1368October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Surender Malhan, Petitioner v. Alina Myronova

from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Question presented

Whether a parent is entitled to a prompt evidentiary hearing when that parent is deprived of physical and legal custody of a child by the State in the context of a child custody proceeding when the factual basis for the deprivation is disputed?

Case path

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Surender Malhan is asking the Supreme Court to hear a New Jersey case about whether a parent must get a prompt hearing where evidence can be tested after the state takes away physical and legal custody. The question focuses on custody disputes where the factual basis for that step is contested.

Argument

The case is pending on a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear it, and no oral argument has been scheduled. No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

Impact

The answer could affect how quickly parents can challenge custody losses in court. For example, a parent who says the state's factual basis is wrong could seek a fast chance to present evidence before more time with a child is lost.

What is the main issue in Malhan v. Myronova?

The petition asks whether a parent must get a prompt hearing when the state removes physical and legal custody and the facts are disputed.

Who could be affected if the Supreme Court hears Surender Malhan v. Alina Myronova?

Parents in custody fights could be affected, especially those who say the state's factual basis is wrong. A faster hearing could matter when a parent is losing time with a child and decision-making authority.

What happens next in Surender Malhan v. Alina Myronova?

The next milestone is whether the Court agrees to hear the case. If it does, the Court would later set briefing and oral argument, but no schedule is available yet.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 23, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3