Henry L. Watson, III, Petitioner v. Kenya Mason, Warden

1. Whether Wisconsin Jury Instruction 820, which instructed the jury to consider perfect self-defense in evaluating Count 1, violated Boy de and Mullaney when the jury failed to consider self-defense, and the State was unconstitutionally relieved of its burden to disprove it; and violated Lockett when the State ’ s statutory interpretation barred consideration of constitutionally relevant evidence. 2. Whether a conflict between a criminal statute and its corresponding jury instruction creates statutory vagueness and ambiguity requiring judicial review of legislative history under the Due Process Clause. 3. Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance under Strickland by pursuing an improper civil remedy and failing to object to the jury ’ s disregard of the instruction and the State ’ s post-verdict reinterpretation of the statute. 4. Whether, under Estelle v. McGuire, a state law violation that categorically barred the jury ’ s consideration of self-defense under Wis. Stat. § 939.48(3) and contradicted Wisconsin Jury Instruction 820 rises to a federal constitutional violation requiring review by this Court.