In Re Haden Christian Yonce, Petitioner

1. Whether a state court acts ultra vires in violation of the Supremacy Clause when it strips the constitutional right to self-representation of a Lead Counsel whom this Court has already implicitly validated by accepting his mandamus petition (Case No. 25-946) and setting a briefing schedule? 2. Whether Petitioner has exhausted lower federal courts when he filed emergency motions in both the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on March 16, 2026, and both courts failed to respond within 72 hours? 3. Whether this Court should issue a writ of prohibition when the state proceeding has resulted in appointment of a guardian ad litem (Christopher McCarty, Esq.) who now controls Petitioner's legal capacity, threatens to withdraw this Court's pending mandamus, and directly contradicts this Court's implicit determination that Petitioner is competent to serve as Lead Counsel? 4. Whether coordinated timing of (a) guardian appointment (March 5), (b) federal Response deadline (March 11), (c) lower courts' refusal to act (72 hours expired March 18), and (d) ongoing state court control over federal litigation establishes emergency requiring this Court's extraordinary intervention under the All Writs Act?