Skip to main content

No. 24-699October Term 2025Decided Jun 23, 2026Updated Sep 2, 2026

Docket 24-699October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Exxon Mobil v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)

Exxon Mobil Corporation, Petitioner v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba), et al.

Exxon Mobil sued Cuban state-owned entities under the Helms-Burton Act over property confiscated by Cuba decades ago.

Case status

Exxon sued Cuban government-owned companies over property Cuba confiscated in 1960. The Court ruled that the Helms-Burton Act removes foreign sovereign immunity (protection from lawsuits) for those entities. Plaintiffs need not meet a separate FSIA (a federal law on foreign immunity) exception.

Decided 6-3 · June 23, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Kavanaugh

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 23, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardFeb 23, 2026
Decision ReleasedJun 23, 2026
What it's about

Exxon Mobil sued Cuban state-owned entities under the Helms-Burton Act over property confiscated by Cuba decades ago. The Court ruled 6-3 for Exxon, holding that the Act itself removes foreign sovereign immunity for Cuban government agencies and instrumentalities, so plaintiffs do not also have to meet an exception in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

Question presented

Does the Helms-Burton Act abrogate foreign sovereign immunity in cases against Cuban instrumentalities, even if the parties do not satisfy an exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Jun 23, 2026

Area

International Law

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

Exxon sued Cuban government-owned companies over property Cuba confiscated in 1960. The Court ruled that the Helms-Burton Act removes foreign sovereign immunity (protection from lawsuits) for those entities. Plaintiffs need not meet a separate FSIA (a federal law on foreign immunity) exception.

Impact

American nationals whose Cuban property was confiscated can sue Cuban government companies under the Helms-Burton Act. They need not separately meet an FSIA exception (a statutory limit on foreign-government lawsuits). For example, Exxon may pursue its damages claim against companies operating expropriated Esso assets. The ruling lets similar claims proceed against Cuban agencies and instrumentalities without satisfying FSIA exceptions. It may affect other U.S. nationals seeking compensation for confiscated Cuban property.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided June 23, 2026

The Court released its decision 120 days after oral argument on February 23, 2026. The median for cases argued in February is 106 days.

Based on 28 merits cases argued in February since 1995.Argument and decision days

Activity

Docket activity7
  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 2, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - BK

    Jun 23, 2026 | Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Mar 8, 2026 | Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A.

    Feb 23, 2026 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Dec 27, 2024 | Court records