No. 20-915October Term 2020Decided Feb 24, 2022Updated May 25, 2026
Unicolors v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L. P.
Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L. P.
Unicolors sued H&M for copying one of its fabric designs, and H&M argued that Unicolors’ copyright registration was invalid because its application inaccurately grouped 31 designs together as a single publication.
Case status
Decided 6-3 · February 24, 2022 · Opinion by Justice Breyer
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Feb 24, 2022
- What it's about
Unicolors sued H&M for copying one of its fabric designs, and H&M argued that Unicolors’ copyright registration was invalid because its application inaccurately grouped 31 designs together as a single publication. The case asked whether that kind of mistake defeats a copyright registration when the applicant did not know the information was inaccurate, including because it misunderstood the law.
Question presented
Did the Ninth Circuit err in breaking with its own prior precedent and the findings of other circuits and the Copyright Office in holding that 17 U.S.C. § 411 requires referral to the Copyright Office where there is no indicia of fraud or material error as to the work at issue in the subject copyright registration?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Feb 24, 2022
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Timing
Decided February 24, 2022
The Court released its decision on February 24, 2022 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Activity
Docket activity3
Brief added: Questions Presented
May 25, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: opinion
Feb 24, 2022 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Jan 4, 2021 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 25, 2026
- Method
- Methodology