Skip to main content

No. 20-915October Term 2020Decided Feb 24, 2022Updated May 25, 2026

Docket 20-915October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Unicolors v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L. P.

Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L. P.

Unicolors sued H&M for copying one of its fabric designs, and H&M argued that Unicolors’ copyright registration was invalid because its application inaccurately grouped 31 designs together as a single publication.

Case status

Decided 6-3 · February 24, 2022 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Feb 24, 2022
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedFeb 24, 2022
What it's about

Unicolors sued H&M for copying one of its fabric designs, and H&M argued that Unicolors’ copyright registration was invalid because its application inaccurately grouped 31 designs together as a single publication. The case asked whether that kind of mistake defeats a copyright registration when the applicant did not know the information was inaccurate, including because it misunderstood the law.

Question presented

Did the Ninth Circuit err in breaking with its own prior precedent and the findings of other circuits and the Copyright Office in holding that 17 U.S.C. § 411 requires referral to the Copyright Office where there is no indicia of fraud or material error as to the work at issue in the subject copyright registration?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Feb 24, 2022

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Timing

Decided February 24, 2022

The Court released its decision on February 24, 2022 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity3
  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    May 25, 2026 | Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Feb 24, 2022 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 4, 2021 | Court records