Skip to main content

No. 20-633October Term 2020Decided Mar 22, 2021Updated Mar 22, 2021

Docket 20-633October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Smith v. Titus

Byron David Smith, a state prisoner seeking federal habeas relief, argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was violated when the courtroom was closed during part of his criminal proceedings.

Case status

Decided · March 22, 2021

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 22, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMar 22, 2021
What it's about

Byron David Smith, a state prisoner seeking federal habeas relief, argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was violated when the courtroom was closed during part of his criminal proceedings. The case asks how broadly the public-trial right applies when a federal court reviews a state conviction under AEDPA.

Question presented

The question presented by this petition is whether the Sixth Amendment’s public trial guarantee, within the review apparatus imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) applies (1) to all phases of a defendant’s criminal trial; or (2) only to pretrial suppression hearings and juror voir dire.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit / Decision released Mar 22, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Timing

Decided March 22, 2021

The Court released its decision on March 22, 2021 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Mar 22, 2021 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Nov 5, 2020 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary-source trail available.
Note
Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 25, 2026
Primary materials5