Skip to main content

No. 20-5904October Term 2020Decided Jun 14, 2021

Docket 20-5904October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

Terry v. United States

This case is about whether a specific group of pre-2010 crack offenders can even ask a judge for a shorter sentence under the First Step Act.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 14, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 14, 2021
What it's about

This case was about whether people convicted before August 3, 2010 of low-level crack cocaine offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) could get shorter sentences under the First Step Act. The Supreme Court held that they could not, because that subsection’s statutory penalties were not changed by the Fair Sentencing Act.

Question presented

Whether pre-August 3, 2010 crack offenders sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) have a “covered offense” under Section 404 of the First Step Act.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Decision released Jun 14, 2021

Area

Criminal Procedure

Briefing

What it's about

The justices are reviewing whether people convicted before August 3, 2010 of low-level crack cocaine offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) can seek shorter sentences under Section 404 of the First Step Act. The dispute is whether that conviction counts as a "covered offense" under the law.

Impact

The answer could affect people still serving older crack-cocaine sentences imposed before Congress reduced the sentencing gap between crack and powder cocaine. For example, someone sentenced under § 841(b)(1)(C) could either get a chance to ask for a lower sentence or be left out entirely.

What's next

No decision window is available yet. Watch for oral argument or another scheduling move from the Court.

What is the main legal fight in Terry v. United States?

The Court is weighing whether convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) count as a "covered offense" under the First Step Act. That label determines whether these defendants may seek resentencing (a new sentence review).

Who could be affected if the Court reads the First Step Act broadly or narrowly?

People convicted before August 3, 2010 of low-level crack offenses under § 841(b)(1)(C) could be affected. A broader reading could let them ask judges for shorter sentences.

What should readers watch for next in this case?

The next public milestone is oral argument or another scheduling move from the Supreme Court. The prompt does not provide a decision window yet.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This case is about whether a specific group of pre-2010 crack offenders can even ask a judge for a shorter sentence under the First Step Act.

Impact

The answer could affect people still serving older crack-cocaine sentences imposed before Congress reduced the sentencing gap between crack and powder cocaine. For example, someone sentenced under § 841(b)(1)(C) could either get a chance to ask for a lower sentence or be left out entirely.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided June 14, 2021

The Court released its decision on June 14, 2021 without hearing oral argument.