No. 20-315October Term 2020Decided Jun 7, 2021
Sanchez v. Mayorkas
This case is about whether TPS can open a path to lawful permanent residence for people who originally entered without permission.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 7, 2021
- What it's about
This case concerned whether a person who entered the United States unlawfully but later received Temporary Protected Status (TPS) could still adjust status to become a lawful permanent resident. Jose Santos Sanchez argued that TPS should count as a lawful admission for that purpose, while the government said it does not.
Question presented
Whether, under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(4), a grant of Temporary Protected Status authorizes eligible noncitizens to obtain lawful-permanent-resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 7, 2021
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
The case asks whether a person who entered the U.S. unlawfully but later received Temporary Protected Status (TPS) can still become a lawful permanent resident. Jose Santos Sanchez says TPS should count as a lawful admission for that step, while the government says it does not.
Vote
The Court has not scheduled oral argument yet. Sanchez argues TPS should satisfy the lawful-admission requirement for adjustment of status, and the government argues that it does not.
Impact
The answer could affect TPS recipients who want green cards through family or work. For example, someone with TPS who has lived in the U.S. for years could face a major barrier to permanent status if TPS does not count as a lawful entry.
What's next
The next big step is whether the Court schedules oral argument or makes another move in the case. No decision window is available yet.
What is the core dispute in Sanchez v. Mayorkas?
The fight is over whether TPS counts as a lawful admission for someone seeking a green card. Sanchez says yes, and the government says no.
Who could be affected if the Court agrees with one side or the other?
TPS recipients who entered unlawfully and later seek permanent residence could be directly affected. The result could either expand or limit their path to a green card.
What should readers watch for next in this case?
Watch for the Supreme Court to schedule oral argument or take another procedural step. Until then, there is no decision timeline to report.
Decision
What the Court decided
This case is about whether TPS can open a path to lawful permanent residence for people who originally entered without permission.
Impact
The answer could affect TPS recipients who want green cards through family or work. For example, someone with TPS who has lived in the U.S. for years could face a major barrier to permanent status if TPS does not count as a lawful entry.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided June 7, 2021
The Court released its decision on June 7, 2021 without hearing oral argument.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 20-315
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 25, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 7, 2021
Petition
brief | Sep 8, 2020
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026