Jefferson v. Shinn

1. Whether the Ninth Circuit’s “materiality” standard for Brady claims—which requires a petitioner to show that the suppressed evidence “would have” changed the outcome of trial—is contrary to this Court’s clearly established precedent. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that a state court’s summary denial of a Brady claim is entitled to AEDPA deference when the state court did not have the suppressed evidence before it.