No. 19-251October Term 2019Decided Jul 1, 2021
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
At this stage, the case is about whether California can require broad donor disclosure from nonprofits without a tighter fit to its investigative goals.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jul 1, 2021
- What it's about
This case was about a California rule requiring charities that raise money in the state to give the attorney general the names and addresses of their major donors. The charities argued that forcing this disclosure burdened donors’ privacy and freedom of association under the First Amendment.
Question presented
Whether the exacting scrutiny this Court has long required of laws that abridge the freedoms of speech and association outside the election context — as called for by NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny — can be satisfied absent any showing that a blanket governmental demand for the individual identities and addresses of major donors to private nonprofit organizations is narrowly tailored to an asserted law-enforcement interest.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jul 1, 2021
- Area
First Amendment, Elections
Briefing
What it's about
The case challenges a California rule that requires charities raising money in the state to give the attorney general the names and addresses of major donors. The charities say that forced disclosure burdens donor privacy and the First Amendment rights of speech and association.
Impact
The case could affect how much personal information governments can demand from nonprofit groups and their supporters. For example, a donor to an advocacy charity may worry that disclosure could expose private beliefs or discourage future giving.
What's next
Watch for the Court to schedule oral argument or make another docket move. No decision window is available yet.
What is the main fight in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta?
The main fight is over California's demand for major donors' names and addresses from charities. The nonprofits say that requirement chills private association and speech.
Who could feel the effects if the Court sides with either side?
Nonprofits, donors, and state regulators could all be affected. A stricter rule could protect donor anonymity, while a broader rule could help state charity oversight.
What should court watchers look for next in this case?
The next key step is whether the Supreme Court schedules oral argument. Until then, there is no set timetable for a final answer from the Court.
Decision
What the Court decided
At this stage, the case is about whether California can require broad donor disclosure from nonprofits without a tighter fit to its investigative goals.
Impact
The case could affect how much personal information governments can demand from nonprofit groups and their supporters. For example, a donor to an advocacy charity may worry that disclosure could expose private beliefs or discourage future giving.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Timing
Decided July 1, 2021
The Court released its decision on July 1, 2021 without hearing oral argument.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials10
Supreme Court docket 19-251
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 25, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jul 1, 2021
Petition
brief | Aug 26, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026