Skip to main content

Appeals over patent review deadlines

Superior Commc'ns v. Voltstar Techs.

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the Federal Circuit’s judgment and sent the case back, but did not decide whether the Board’s decision could be appealed.

Where it stands
Case remanded

Remanded · April 27, 2020

What it’s about
Superior Communications and Voltstar Technologies disputed whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to start a patent review could be appealed when the review petition’s compliance with a one-year deadline was at issue.
Who it affects
The Federal Circuit must reconsider its judgment in the dispute between Superior and Voltstar; the Supreme Court did not settle whether the Board’s decision to start the review could be appealed.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Superior Commc'ns, Inc. v. Voltstar Techs., Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court wiped out the Federal Circuit’s judgment (vacated it) and sent the case back for another look (remanded) in light of Thryv, without deciding that appealability question.

A party can ask the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, part of the Patent and Trademark Office, to review a patent.

Question presented

Whether the Federal Circuit’s “all-elements rule” for patent infringement under the doctrine of equivalents—which requires that an accused product contain every element of a patent claim or its equivalent—is consistent with this Court’s precedent in Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997), and Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002)?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).

Result
Remanded

What's next

The case returns to the Federal Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s Thryv decision.

Documents

1

Docket activity

21
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis