Skip to main content

Federal review of state rulings

Wilson v. Sellers

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the Eleventh Circuit’s judgment and returned Wilson’s case to that court for another look.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · April 17, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
The Supreme Court overturned the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling and sent Wilson’s case back to it (remanded).
Who it affects
The order sends Wilson’s case back to the Eleventh Circuit; it does not give the final outcome of his challenge to his imprisonment.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Wilson v. Sellers
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

It said a federal court reviewing a prisoner’s challenge should presume an unexplained state ruling used the reasons in the last related state decision that explained its ruling, unless the state shows it likely relied on different grounds.

The dispute arose from federal review of a state court’s unexplained rejection of Wilson’s claim.

Question presented

Did this Court's decision in Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011), silently abrogate the presumption set forth in Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797 (1991)—that a federal court sitting in habeas proceedings should "look through" a summary state court ruling to review the last reasoned decision—as a slim majority of the en banc Eleventh Circuit held in this case, despite the agreement of both parties that the Ylst presumption should continue to apply?

What the Court decided

Holding

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kagan
  3. Kennedy
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Roberts
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Thomas
  2. Gorsuchwrote the dissent
  3. Alito
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

What's next

The case returns to the Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings. The final outcome of Wilson’s challenge is not stated here.

Each side's argument

Wilson
Wilson argued that federal courts should keep using the rule that looks to the last state-court decision that explained its reasons.
Sellers
Sellers also agreed that the rule should continue to apply.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Wilson

    Apr 17, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Apr 17, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis