Skip to main content

Whistleblower retaliation protection

Digital Realty Trust v. Somers

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the Ninth Circuit’s judgment and sent Somers’s case back to that court.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · February 21, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
Paul Somers alleged that Digital Realty Trust fired him after he reported possible securities-law violations to company managers, but he had not reported them to the SEC.
Who it affects
The Ninth Circuit must take up Somers’s case again after its earlier judgment was overturned.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation protection covers only people who report alleged violations to the SEC, overturned the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).

Paul Somers alleged that Digital Realty Trust fired him after he reported possible securities-law violations to company managers. He had not reported them to the SEC.

The dispute concerned protection from workplace retaliation for reporting possible securities-law violations under Dodd-Frank.

Question presented

Whether the anti-retaliation provision for ''whistle- blowers" in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 extends to individuals who have not reported alleged misconduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission and thus fall outside the Act's definition of a ''whistleblower."?

What the Court decided

Holding

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Kennedy
  4. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  5. Sotomayoralso wrote separately
  6. Roberts
Concurring · 3agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Thomaswrote separately
  2. Gorsuch
  3. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment (3 writing separately).

What's next

The case returns to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Somers

    Feb 21, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Feb 21, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis