Skip to main content

Bankruptcy insider status

U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the Ninth Circuit and left its ruling in place (affirmed).

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 5, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

What it’s about
U.S. Bank challenged a Chapter 11 plan after a buyer voted on a claim originally held by an insider, arguing the buyer should also count as an insider.
Who it affects
The Ninth Circuit's ruling remains in place in the bankruptcy dispute involving U.S. Bank and Village at Lakeridge.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously left the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in place (affirmed), deciding that a bankruptcy judge’s finding of nonstatutory insider status is reviewed for clear error—a clear mistake.

The dispute arose in a Chapter 11 case over a buyer's vote on a claim originally held by an insider.

Question presented

Whether the appropriate standard of review for determining non-statutory insider status is the de novo standard of review applied by the Third, Seventh and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeal, or the clearly erroneous standard of review adopted for the first time by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in this action?

What the Court decided

Holding

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy, Thomas, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kaganwrote the opinion
  3. Thomas
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Roberts
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Alito
Concurring · 2agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Kennedywrote separately
  2. Sotomayorwrote separately
9 justices joined the judgment (2 writing separately).

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its review, and the Ninth Circuit's ruling remains in place.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Mar 5, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Mar 5, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis