Skip to main content

Fees for defending fee requests

Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The firms cannot receive court-awarded fees under §330(a)(1) for defending their fee applications.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · June 15, 2015 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
Baker Botts and another law firm sought fees for defending their fee requests in ASARCO’s bankruptcy. The Supreme Court ruled that bankruptcy courts cannot award bankruptcy professionals fees for defending fee applications and agreed with the Fifth Circuit.
Who it affects
Bankruptcy professionals hired under §327(a) cannot receive court-awarded fees for defending their fee applications.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Baker Botts and another law firm sought payment for time spent defending their fee requests during ASARCO LLC’s bankruptcy.

The dispute was about whether the Bankruptcy Code makes an exception to the usual rule that each side pays its own lawyer.

Question presented

Does the Bankruptcy Code allow a firm to be awarded damages for defending a challenge to a fee request?

What the Court decided

Holding

Section §330(a)(1) does not permit bankruptcy courts to award fees to §327(a) professionals for defending fee applications. 751 F. 3d 291, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Thomaswrote the opinion
  2. Scalia
  3. Kennedy
  4. Sotomayoralso wrote separately
  5. Roberts
  6. Alito
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Breyerwrote the dissent
  2. Kagan
  3. Ginsburg
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

From the opinions

“In my view, when a bankruptcy court determines “reasonable compensation,” it may take into account the expenses that a professional has incurred in defending his or her application for fees.”

— Justice Breyer(dissent)

What's next

Bankruptcy courts must apply this rule when deciding fee requests by professionals hired under §327(a).

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Jun 15, 2015 · Court records

More questions

1
What did Justice Breyer say about fee-defense costs?
He said courts could consider those costs when setting reasonable compensation for the firms’ underlying bankruptcy work.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis