Skip to main content

Pay for security screening time

Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court ruled that the FLSA did not require Integrity Staffing to pay Busk and Castro for time spent waiting for and going through the screenings.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · December 9, 2014 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
Warehouse workers Jesse Busk and Laurie Castro sought pay for time spent waiting for and going through required security screenings at Integrity Staffing Solutions.
Who it affects
Busk and Castro cannot recover under the FLSA for time spent waiting for and undergoing these screenings.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Jesse Busk
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Ninth Circuit and ruled that the screening time was not payable under federal wage law because the screenings were not integral to the workers’ main duties.

The dispute asked whether required security screenings counted as paid time under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.

Question presented

Is time spent undergoing security clearances compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947?

What the Court decided

Holding

The time that respondents spent waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings is not compensable under the FLSA. 713 F. 3d 525, reversed.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

The Court said the screenings were not essential to another main activity the workers were hired to perform, so waiting for and undergoing them did not qualify as paid time under the FLSA.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomaswrote the opinion
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayoralso wrote separately
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The ruling settles the federal wage question for these screening periods. Lower courts must apply the Court’s ruling; it does not specify a separate next step for the parties.

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Integrity Staffing

    Dec 9, 2014 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis