Skip to main content

Federal law and towing rules

Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court left New Hampshire’s ruling in place: this federal law does not block Pelkey’s state-law claims about storing and disposing of his car.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 13, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
After Dan’s City towed Robert Pelkey’s car, Pelkey claimed the company violated New Hampshire rules in storing and disposing of it.
Who it affects
For people bringing state-law claims over a towed vehicle’s storage or disposal, Section 14501(c)(1) is not a bar.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Dan's City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan's City Auto Body v. Robert Pelkey
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court agreed with New Hampshire’s highest court that federal law does not override (preempt) state-law claims about a towed car’s storage and disposal.

Dan’s City auctioned Pelkey’s car despite his notice that he wanted to reclaim it; the car was eventually traded.

The case concerned Section 14501(c)(1) of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 and New Hampshire rules for selling and disposing of towed vehicles.

Question presented

Are state law claims against a tow-motor carrier based on state law regulating the sale and disposal of a towed vehicle preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994?

What the Court decided

Holding

Section 14501(c)(1) does not preempt state-law claims stemming from the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle. 163 N. H. 483, 44 A. 3d 480, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

Majority author
Ruth Bader Ginsburg

What's next

The New Hampshire ruling remains in place. The Supreme Court resolved whether this federal law blocks the claims, not whether Dan’s City violated New Hampshire rules.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Pelkey

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Pelkey

    May 13, 2013 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis