Skip to main content

Offers in group wage lawsuits

Genesis HealthCare v. Symczyk

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court said Symczyk's suit should be thrown out, but left unanswered whether Genesis's full offer itself made her individual claim no longer live.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · April 16, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
Laura Symczyk sued Genesis HealthCare over meal-break pay for herself and co-workers; Genesis offered to fully resolve her claim before others joined.
Who it affects
Symczyk's suit was to be thrown out, but the Court did not decide whether a full offer alone ends a group lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Genesis HealthCare Corporation v. Laura Symczyk
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court overturned the appeals court: without deciding whether her claim was moot (no longer a live dispute), it found she had no stake in representing others or other interest keeping the suit alive.

Symczyk brought a group lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, seeking to include other employees she said were in similar situations.

Question presented

Does an offer of judgment providing full relief to a single plaintiff extinguish a collective action FLSA suit when no other parties had yet joined the suit?

What the Court decided

Holding

Because respondent had no personal interest in representing putative, unnamed claimants, nor any other continuing interest that would preserve her suit from mootness, her suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 656 F. 3d 189, reversed.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

The Court assumed, without deciding, that Symczyk's individual claim had become moot (no longer a live dispute). It said she had no personal stake in representing unnamed workers and no other continuing interest to keep her suit alive.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Thomaswrote the opinion
  2. Scalia
  3. Kennedy
  4. Roberts
  5. Alito
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Breyer
  2. Kaganwrote the dissent
  3. Ginsburg
  4. Sotomayor
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

From the opinions

“The Court today resolves an imaginary question, based on a mistake the courts below made about this case and others like it.”

— Justice Kagan(dissent)

What's next

Symczyk's suit should be thrown out under the Court's ruling. The Court left open whether Genesis's offer ended her individual claim.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Symczyk

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Symczyk

    Apr 16, 2013 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis