Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

January 2027 oral arguments

5 cases across 4 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Four argument days, January 11 to January 20, 2027. One of them has more than one case.

2 cases
Attorney fees for detention challengesKevin Isaac Montoya Palacios v. Vernon Liggins, Acting Field Office Director, Baltimore, Maryland, Immigration and Customs EnforcementWhether, under EAJA, "any civil action" encompasses an action seeking a writ of habeas corpus to challenge civil immigration detention?Argument 25-1223Civil contempt for injunction violationsApple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.1. Whether a court may hold a party in civil contempt based on a violation of an injunction's "spirit" where the injunction is silent as to the conduct upon which contempt is based, as the Ninth Circuit holds; or, instead, whether a court must ground a finding of civil contempt on the violation of an order that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, as other circuits hold. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit has properly created an "antitrust" or "competition" exception to Trump v. CASA, Inc ., 606 U.S. 831 (2025), and the longstanding equitable principles on which CASA rests, or otherwise disregarded CASA 's limits.Argument 25-1311

1 case
Jury size in felony trialsHamed Kian v. FloridaWhether Petitioner was derived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a serious felony?Argument 25-6623

1 case
Military retirement pay agreementsRoxane M. Marschner v. Richard A. MarschnerDoes the USFSPA require state courts to refuse enforcement of indemnification provisions in divorce settlement agreements?Argument 25-1349

1 case
Religious buildings and zoningMissionaries of Saint John the Baptist, Inc. v. Joel Frederic, et ux.1. Whether prohibiting a religious organization from constructing a religious structure on its own property imposes a substantial burden under RLUIPA. 2. Whether a zoning ordinance violates RLUIPA’s equal-terms provision by imposing express restrictions on religious assemblies that do not apply to nonreligious assemblies.Argument 25-1131