Skip to main content

Military retirement pay agreements

Marschner v. Marschner

Updated Nov 2, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Argument Scheduled

Oral argument January 19, 2027

Decision expected by late June 2027

What it’s about
This case concerns a divorce settlement in which a military retiree agreed to reimburse his former spouse if her share of his retirement pay was reduced after he elected disability benefits.
What's at stake
The case could affect divorced military families when a veteran's change to disability pay reduces a former spouse's agreed share of retirement income.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Roxane M. Marschner v. Richard A. Marschner
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition asks whether federal law bars a state court from enforcing that agreed-upon reimbursement provision, even though the Supreme Court held in Howell v. Howell that courts generally cannot order such reimbursement on their own.

The case concerns the boundary between federal limits on dividing military disability-related retirement pay and state enforcement of divorce settlements.

Question presented

Does the USFSPA require state courts to refuse enforcement of indemnification provisions in divorce settlement agreements?

What happens next

Expected by late June 2027

Argument is on the calendar for January 19, 2027. Decisions typically follow within about 93 days of argument. Nearly all opinions are released before the term ends in late June or early July 2027.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

Why it matters

For example, it could determine whether a former spouse may enforce an agreement intended to cover that reduction.

Documents

2

Docket activity

25
  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Nov 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: title

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: title

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 19, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: title, cert_granted_date

    Oct 1, 2026 · Court records

  • New document added

    Oct 1, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 9, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 8, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Marschner v. Marschner?
The case asks whether federal law bars enforcement of divorce-settlement terms that compensate a former spouse after retirement payments are reduced for disability pay.
Who could be affected by this military retirement dispute?
Divorced service members and former spouses could be affected when retirement pay is waived for disability pay, reducing a former spouse's share.
What happens next in Marschner v. Marschner?
The Court will consider the petition for certiorari, meaning whether to hear the case. Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 2, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis