Emergency application
Insurance dispute
Gail Wiggan v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club
Has the Court ruled?
Not yet. The Court has not ruled on the request.
It was filed October 4, 2026.
What's being asked
Gail Wiggan asks the Supreme Court to pause a ruling by the Supreme Court of California. The record does not describe the dispute between Wiggan and Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club or explain what the ruling says.
What happens next
The Court has not ruled and can act at any time, with or without an explanation. No response deadline was requested, and the record lists no referral, administrative stay, or argument date. The Court can grant the request, deny it, or grant part of it.
What it means
If granted, Wiggan's request would temporarily pause the California Supreme Court ruling, but would not decide who wins the dispute. The record does not say what proceedings continue in California courts. No related merits case is listed, and the application is not set for argument.
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A556. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.