Skip to main content

Emergency application

Paul David Schultz v. Bokf, N.A.

Awaiting action
No. 26A555Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Has the Court ruled?

Not yet. The Court has not ruled on the request.

It was filed October 15, 2026.

Filed

What's being asked

Paul David Schultz asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a Fourth Circuit ruling in his dispute with BOKF, N.A. The docket does not describe the dispute or say what the ruling ordered.

What happens next

The Court has not ruled and can act at any time, with or without an explanation. No response deadline, referral to the full Court, administrative stay, or argument date is listed. The Court can grant the request, deny it, or grant part of it.

What it means

The application has not paused the Fourth Circuit's ruling; if granted, Schultz's request would pause it temporarily. An emergency ruling would not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The docket lists no related Supreme Court case or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A555. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 21, 2026