Skip to main content

Emergency application

Immigration court closures

City of Baltimore, Maryland v. Texas

Awaiting action
No. 26A500Stay applicationFiled by a state or local governmentPresented to Justice AlitoFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Has the Court ruled?

Not yet. The Court has not ruled on the request.

The Court asked the other side to respond by 4 p.m. ET on October 22, 2026.

Filed Response due 4 p.m. ET on October 22, 2026

What's being asked

Baltimore, Columbus, New Haven, and Centro Legal de la Raza ask the Supreme Court to pause a federal district court judgment in Texas. Their filing says Texas's lawsuit against the Justice Department and immigration-court officials concerns the administrative-closure rule. They argue federal law may not authorize that rule.

What happens next

The Court has not ruled and can act at any time, with or without an explanation. Justice Alito requested a response by 4 p.m. ET on October 22, 2026; the application has not been referred to the full Court. No temporary pause is in place, and no argument is set; the Court can grant, deny, or partly grant the request.

Half of 78 rulings on applications where the Court asked for a response came 10 to 26 days after filing, and the median was 17 days; this one's latest docket entry came 6 days after filing.

What it means

Any emergency ruling would be temporary and would not decide who wins the underlying case. The Fifth Circuit appeal continues; no related Supreme Court case on the main question exists, and this application has no argument date. If granted, the request would temporarily pause the district court judgment for the cities and nonprofit.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A500. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 17, 2026