Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Emergency application

Media merger challenge

Pamela Faust v. Paramount Skydance Corporation

Denied
No. 26A455Injunction applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on October 5, 2026, so nothing changes while the case continues in the lower courts.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 0 days after filing

What's being asked

A private party asks the Supreme Court for an emergency order (an injunction) while the case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case is Pamela Faust v. Paramount Skydance Corporation.

What the Court did

The Court denied the request on October 5, 2026, so nothing changes while the case continues in the lower courts.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 256 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 33 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 0 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A455. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 5, 2026